THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION

CONSTITUTIONALLY ESTABLISHING THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION

DATE 8/10/2026.

(A) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSTITUTION'S FIRST AMENDMENT CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION: THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION CONSTITUTIONALLY ESTABLISHING THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION. OPENING REMARKS:THE COUNTRY KNOWN AS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS OF THE YEAR 2024 A.D. ( I.E., ANNO DOMINI ) ALLOWS THE FREEDOM OF RELIGIOUS PRACTICE MEANING YOU MAY BEGIN YOUR OWN RELIGION OR JOIN OR FOLLOW A RELIGION ALREADY ESTABLISHED. THE FOLLOWING WORDS ARE THE EXACT WORDS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME LAWGIVING DOCUMENT OF THE COUNTRY:"CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXCERCISE THEREOF; OR ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS; OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE, AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES." THIS QUOTATION IS TAKEN FROM THE BOOK CALLED 'THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . #13611. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION. PREPARED BY THE CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. 99TH CONGRESS. SENATE. DOCUMENT NO. 99-16. UNITED STATES PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON 19817. THIS LARGE BOOK IS DISCOVERED IN THE SEATTLE CENTRAL PUBLIC LIBRARY OF WASHINGTON STATE, IN THE MAIN REFERENCE SECTION, LEVEL 7, LIBRARY BOOK SPINE NUMBER: R.CEN. R342.73. UN32C.1982. THE NUMBER OF PAGES IN THIS VOLUME ARE 1 TO 2307; IT S THE 1982 EDITION, AND STAMPED ON THE FRONT OF THE BOOK ARE THESE WORDS "A LIBRARY REFERENCE BOOK NOT TO BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ROOM." THE BOOK BARCODE NUMBER IS 0010007179905. CLEARLY, THIS BOOK IS A CORNERSTONE AUTHORITY ON THE CONSITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND CLEARLY IT IS PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ITSELF, AND CLEARLY IT PROMOTES THE HIGHEST LAW-GIVING DOCUMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. CAREFULLY SAID, THIS FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS WHAT CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYERS CALL "THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE" AND IT IS THIS: "...CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXCERCISE THEREOF..." THIS IS THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE. THEREFORE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CANNOT PREVENT THE BONDAMUSI FROM ESTABLISHING THEIR RELIGION, OR PRACTICING THEIR RELIGION AND BELIEVING THEIR RELIGION AND IMPORTANTLY CULTIVATING THEIR RELIGION, AND THIS IS WHAT THE BONDAMUSI HAVE THE RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE TO DO UNDER THE PROTECTIVE UMBRELLA OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S FIRST AMENDMENT.

(B) BUT BEFORE ME I HAVE ANOTHER LAW BOOK CALLED: "THE FIRST AMENDMENT LAW: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION. 4^TH EDITION. CO-WRITTEN BY: (1) ARTHUR HELLMAN, PROFESSOR OF LAW; AND (2) WILLIAM D. ARAIZA, PROFESSOR OF LAW; AND (3) THOMAS E. BAKER PROFESSOR OF LAW; AND (4) ASHUTOSH A. BHAGWAT, ALSO A PROFESSOR OF LAW. AND FOR SHORT AND FOR NOW, LET US CALL THIS REFERENCE BOOK, "HELLMAN'S LAWBOOK". CLEARLY IT IS AN AUTHORITY ON THE UNITED STATES FIRST AMENDMENTS AND INCLUDES IMPORTANT INSIGHTS AND OPINIONS ABOUT IT; AND IT IS ALSO TO BE ESPECIALLY NOTED THAT IT HAS BEEN WRITTEN BY FOUR CONSIDERABLE AND ABLE-MINDED PROFESSORS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. THIS BOOK IS PUBLISHED BY CAROLINA ACADEMIC PRESS, 700 KENT STREET, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27701, IN THE YEAR 2018. THE ISBN IS 978-1-53100-941-0. INTERESTINGLY WE READ ON PAGE 788 OF {THE NOW CALLED} "HELLMAN'S LAWBOOK" THE FOLLOWING REMARKS:

(C) THE "ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION CLAUSE" OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT {MEANING THE NOTIONS AND IDEAS INHERENT IN THE FIRST AMENDMENTS CAREFUL WORDING} MEANS AT LEAST THIS: NEITHER A STATE NOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN SET UP A CHURCH. NEITHER CAN PASS LAWS WHICH AID ONE RELIGION, {OR} AID ALL RELIGIONS, OR PREFER ONE RELIGION OVER ANOTHER. NEITHER CAN FORCE NOR INFLUENCE A PERSON TO GO TO OR REMAIN AWAY FROM THEIR CHURCH AGAINST HIS WILL OR FORCE HIM TO PROFESS A BELIEF OR DISBELIEF IN ANY RELIGION. NO PERSON CAN BE PUNISHED FOR ENTERTAINING OR PROFESSING RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR DISBELIEFS, FOR CHURCH ATTENDANCE OR NO ATTENDANCE. NO TAX IN ANY AMOUNT, LARGE AND SMALL, CAN BE LEVIED TO SUPPORT ANY RELIGIOUS ACTIVITIES OR INSTITUTIONS, WHATEVER THEY MAY BE CALLED, OR WHATEVER FORM THEY ADOPT TO TEACH OR PRACTICE THEIR RELIGION. NEITHER A STATE NOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN, OPENLY OR SECRETLY, PARTICIPATE IN THE AFFAIRS OF ANY RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS OR GROUPS AND VICE VERSA. IN THE WORDS OF JEFFERSON, THE CLAUSE AGAINST ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION BY LAW WAS INTENDED TO ERECT A "WALL OF SEPERATION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE."

(D) ON PAGE 989 OF "HELLMAN'S BOOK" WE READ WHAT THE WORD RELIGION "MAY MEAN" TO THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES. BUT UNFORTUNATELY A "DEFINITION OF THE WORD" HAS NEVER BEEN GIVEN: IT IS ARGUED THAT "THE RELIGION CLAUSES {MEANING THE VERY FIRST FEW WORDS MENTIONED IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT} CLEARLY USES THE TERM "RELIGION." BUT WHAT DOES THIS WORD ACTUALLY MEAN TO THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES? IT MEANS THIS: THAT WHATEVER IT { IT MEANING RELIGION} IS OR TURNS OUT TO BE CAN BE EXCERCISED FREELY BY THE INDIVIDUAL BUT CANNOT BE ESTABLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT.... PERHAPS NOT SUPRISINGLY {THEN} THE SUPREME COURT HAS NOT ATTEMPTED TO PROMULGATE A FORMAL DICTIONARY DEFINITION. THE THEOLOGICAL REASON IS THAT THERE IS NO SINGLE CHARACTERISTIC, OR EVEN A SET OF CHARACTERISTICS, THAT ALL RELIGIOUS BELIEF SYSTEMS HAVE IN COMMON. NOT EVEN THE CONCEPT OF "GOD" IS COMMON TO ALL THE WORLD'S GREAT RELIGIONS. THE SOBER CONSTITUTIONAL REASON FOR NOT OFFERING A DEFINITION OF RELIGION IS THAT THE COURT WOULD NECESSARILY RAISE SERIOUS THEOLOGICAL ESTABLISHMENT CONCERNS ABOUT HAVING TO PROVE THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THE GOD OF THE SAID RELIGION ITSELF. THEREFORE NO DEFINITION OF RELIGION IS RECOGNIZED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.

(E) ON PAGE 963 OF HELLMAN'S LAWBOOK" WE READ THIS INTERESTING REMARK THE "FREE EXCERCISE" OF RELIGION OFTEN, IF NOT INVARIABLY, REQUIRES THE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE (OR ACTUAL ABSTENTION FROM) RELIGIOUS ACTS. THEREFORE AND BECAUSE THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND RELIGIOUS CONDUCT, CONDUCT MOTIVATED BY SINCERE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, LIKE THE BELIEF ITSELF, MUST PRESUMPTIVELY PROTECTED BY THE FREE EXCERCISE CLAUSE." IT IS IMPLIED, THEN, THAT THE EXERCISE OF RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY INCLUDES PHYSICALLY INVOLVING YOURSELVES IN RITES, RITUALS AS WELL AS A BELIEF SYSTEM. MEANING, WHAT THE BONDAMUSI DEEMS AS INHERENTLY SUITABLE CONDUCT IN ITS RITES AND RITUALS IS NOT TO BE SEPERATED FROM THE RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT HAS DECIDED TO ADOPT.THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION HAS SOLID CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVILIDGES THAT ALLOW IT CREATE AND ENJOY ITS OWN RELIGION AND THE BELEIF IN ITS RELIGION AND THE FREE EXERCISE AND USE OF RELIGIOUS ACTS AND RITUALS. AND TO DEVELOP AND DEPLOY THE RELIGIOUS BENEFITS THAT IT OFFERS THOSE THAT DECIDE TO JOIN IT. MOREOVER IF WE LOOK CLOSELY AT THE READING WE SEE THE SUGGESTION "...OR WHATEVER FORM THEY ADOPT TO TEACH OR PRACTICE THEIR RELIGION..." THIS SAID THE BONDAMUSI CLEARLY STATES RIGHT NOW THAT THE RELIGION OF THE BONDAMUSI ONLY ADMITS PEOPLE OVER THE AGE OF 18 AND ONLY WHEN THEY DO SO WITH THEIR OWN FREE WILL. ON THE ONE HAND THE BONDMUSI RELIGION CONFORMS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL GUIDELINES; BUT ON THE OTHER HAND ALSO PROCLAIMS THAT SEX-RITUALS BETWEEN CONSENTING ADULTS ARE TO BE PART OF THE BONDAMUS CATHEDRAL BUT ONLY IN A CAREFULLY CONTROLLED, RESERVED RELIGIOUS ENVIRONMENT COMPLETE WITH COMPETENT AND EDUCATED INITIATES OF THE RELIGION, THERE WILL BE THE VOLUNTARY BUT CONSERVATIVE USE OF RITUAL ALCHOL AND THE VOLUNTARY BUT CONTROLLED USE OF LEGAL RECREATIONAL DRUGS. THE USE OF LEGAL RECREATIONAL DRUGS AND ALCHOL DURING THE BONDAMUSI'S SEXUAL RITUALS ARE COMPLETELY VOLUNTARY TO THOSE INVOLVED IN THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION, AND SUCH ACTIVITIES ARE CLEARLY GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE LOCAL STATE LAWS AND THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND SUCH VOLUNTARY ACTIVITIES ARE GOVERENED IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT DOES NO HARM TO VOLUNTEERS OF THE RELIGIOUS RITES AND RITUALS, OR CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, AND WHEREBY IT IS ALSO TRUE THAT ALL CITIZENS CAN LEGALLY INGEST AND PARTICIPATE IN THE SAME OR SIMILAR ACTIVITIES AS THE BONDAMUSI, AS IT IS LEGAL TO DO, THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO DO SO IN THE RITES AND RITUALS UNLESS THEY ARE INVITED TO DO SO. THEREFORE THE FREE EXERCISE OF THE BONDAMUSI S UNIQUE RITES AND RITUALS WITHIN THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION ARE GENUINELY PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION WITHOUT INFRINGING ON STATE OR FEDERAL LAW.

(F) THE PURPOSE AND THE POWER OF RELIGION IS IMPORTANT TO PINPOINT AND MENTION AS WELL. SOME GIVEN PURPOSES OF CREATING A RELIGION ARE: IT ALLOWS THE INDIVIDUAL A STRONGER SENSE OF WELL-BEING; IT ALLOWS THE INDIVIDUAL A MORE SECURE SELF-IDENTITY AS WELL AS ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL A GENERAL PEACE OF MIND. AND THIS IS WHAT THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION OFFERS THOSE WHO DECIDE TO JOINT IT. FOR EXAMPLE ON PAGE 807 OF "HELLMAN'S LAWBOOK" WE READ: THE PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY THROUGH THE MANDATES OF THE RELIGIOUS CLAUSE {AS ABOVE IDENTIFIED} HAS ALSO BEEN JUSTIFIED AS CRITICAL TO PROMOTING SELF-IDENTITY. ACCORDING TO THIS THEORY, RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION REFLECTS A FUNDAMENTAL BONDING BETWEEN THE RELIGIOUS ADHERENT AND HER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY. AS ONE COMMENTATOR HAS WRITTEN, "RELIGIOUS BELIEFS FORM A CENTRAL PART OF A PERSON'S BELIEF STRUCTURE, HIS INNER SELF. THEY DEFINE A PERSON'S VERY BEING -HIS SENSE OF WHO HE IS, WHY HE EXISTS, AND HOW HE SHOULD RELATE TO THE WORLD AROUND HIM. A PERSON'S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS CANNOT MEANINGFULLY BE SEPERATED FROM THE PERSON HIMSELF; THEY ARE WHO HE IS." THEREFORE, ALLOWING THE GOVERNMENT TO INTERFERE WITH AN ADHERENT'S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WOULD BE IMPERMISSABLE BECAUSE IT WOULD ATTACK THE INDIVIDUAL'S FUNDAMENTAL SELF." NOW THIS INSIGHT IS IMPORTANT FOR MANY REASONS, BUT ONE REASON IS THIS: THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION AGREES THAT PEOPLE CANNOT POSSIBLY BE A BONDAMUSI IF THEY DO NOT FOLLOW WHAT THE BONDAMUSI BELIEVE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE FOLLOWING GENERAL IDEAS ARE WHAT THE BONDAMUSI BELIEVE AND TO DENY THEM WOULD DENY YOUR RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION WITH THE BONDAMUSI: BRIEFLY, ITS THE BONDAMUSI'S BELIEF THAT THE PLANET IS TO BE CALLED PLANET BONDAMUSI; IT IS TO BE PROTECTED AND LOVED BY THE PEOPLE LIVING ON IT AND THE PEOPLE LIVING ON THE PLANET ARE TO BE CALLED THE BONDAMUSI; AND IT IS BEST TO HAVE A WORLD DICTATOR, WHICH WE CALL THE BONDAMUSI ETERNAL TO ENFORCE THIS RELIGIOUS BELIEF. THERE IS ONE MORE THING TO SAY:WE ARGUE THAT A WORLD DICTATOR IS REQUIRED WHEN FIRST-CONTACT HAS BEEN EXPERIENCED.

(G) INTERESTINGLY, ON PAGE 904 OF "HELLMAN'S LAW BOOK" WE READ THIS PARAGRAPH FROM THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, JUSTICE O' CONNER "...REASONABLE MINDS CAN DISAGREE ABOUT HOW TO APPLY THE RELIGIOUS CLAUSES IN A GIVEN CASE. BUT THE GOAL OF THE CLAUSES IS CLEAR: TO CARRY OUT THE FOUNDERS' PLAN {OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA} OF PRESERVING RELIGIOUS LIBERTY TO THE FULLEST EXTENT POSSIBLE IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY. BY ENFORCING THE CLAUSES, WE HAVE KEPT RELIGION A MATTER FOR THE INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE, NOT FOR THE PROSECUTOR OR BUREAUCRAT. AT A TIME WHEN WE SEE AROUND THE WORLD THE VIOLENT CONSEQUENCES OF THE ASSUMPTION OF RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY BY GOVERNMENT, AMERICANS MAY COUNT THEMSELVES FORTUNATE: OUR REGARD FOR CONSTITUTIONAL BOUNDARIES HAS PROTECTED US FROM SIMILAR TRAVILES, WHILE ALLOWING PRIVATE RELIGIOUS EXCERCISE TO FLOURISH...AMERICANS ATTEND THEIR PLACE OF WORSHIP MORE OFTEN THAN DO CITIZENS OF OTHER DEVELOPED NATIONS, AND DESCRIBE RELIGION AS PLAYING AN ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT ROLE IN THEIR LIVES. THOSE WHO WOULD RENEGOTIATE THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE MUST THEREFORE ANSWER A DIFFICULT QUESTION: WHY WOULD WE TRADE A SYSTEM THAT HAS SERVED US WELL FOR ONE THAT HAS SERVED OTHERS SO POORLY... " THIS IS HIGHLY INTERESTING READING BECAUSE WE ARE ALLOWED TO CALL THE BONDAMUSI A "PRIVATE RELIGION" MEANING IT WOULD BE A RELIGION ONLY ALLOWING THOSE THAT BELIEVED COMPLETELY IN THE BONDAMUSI'S RELIGIOUS POLICY TO JOIN. THIS IS VERY CAREFULLY SAID. CLEARLY ATHIESTS COULD NOT JOIN A RELIGION THAT BELIEVED IN GOD. IN A SIMILAR WAY ONLY IF YOU BELIEVED THE BONDAMUSI RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE OF FAITH WOULD YOU BE ALLOWED TO BE A BONDAMUSI. THEREFORE WE WILL SAY, FORMALLY THAT THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION IS A PRIVATE RELIGION ONLY ALLOWING THOSE THAT COMPLETELY BELIEVE IN THE BONDAMUSI RELIGION TO BECOME A MEMBER OF IT, AND THIS CLAIM IS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTABLE.